48AF3A60-914C-4C95-B1E0-3397FF00C1E9 Created with sketchtool.
Calculator
Russia, Government, 4 999 employees
7E919FA3-84AA-4530-B42D-91BADB226992 Created with sketchtool.
  • All
  • APAC & Japan
  • Europe
  • LATAM
  • META
  • North America
  • Russia
7E919FA3-84AA-4530-B42D-91BADB226992 Created with sketchtool.
  • All
  • Finance
  • Government
  • Industrial/Manufacturing
  • IT & Telecoms
  • Retail & Wholesale
$
Calculate
Calculate your company's security profile
This is the ultimate guide to the cost of IT security. Select the details that match your company to see the average budgets your industry peers spend on IT security (by region, industry, size), what security measures they take, the major threat vectors they encounter, how much money they lose as a result, and what you can do to avoid being compromised. The Calculator has been created as an adjustable tool. The data presented can be updated and/or added to over time based on insights from customers and Kaspersky Lab.
IT security budget in 2018
Data provided by 22 respondents*
Russia, Government, 4 999 employees
IT Security budget makes up 15% of the total IT spend
average
$ 313 747
average
$ 313 747
max
$ 2 062 500
2018
2021
Expected change to IT security budget in three years
+ 19 %
year
2018
2021
Security measures in place
Data provided by 34 respondents*
Russia, Government, 4 999 employees
Threats experienced in the last 12 months
Data provided by 34 respondents*
Russia, Government, 4 999 employees
53%
Viruses & malware
47%
Physical loss of devices or media
44%
Inappropriate IT resource use by employees
32%
Cryptomalware/ransomware
29%
Inappropriate sharing of data via mobile devices
24%
Targeted attacks
21%
Electronic leakage of data from internal systems
21%
Incidents involving non-computing, connected devices
18%
Data breach
18%
DDoS attacks
18%
Incidents affecting third party cloud services used by the business
15%
Incidents affecting suppliers that the business shares data with
15%
Incidents affecting IT Infrastructure hosted by a third party
15%
Incidents affecting virtualized environments
68%
Any cyberthreat
$ 177 688
Average cost of one incident
Recommendations

Government organizations are a key target for cyber-terrorism and state-sponsored attacks, so we recommend investment in a targeted attack detection and mitigation strategy, including empowering the SOC with the most advanced possible threat intelligence. It’s also important for government bodies to be fully aware of high profile cyber-espionage campaigns through comprehensive, practical reporting from security knowledge providers. Compliance is a big issue for government organizations, so we also recommend using an on-demand version of threat intelligence for isolated networks, where regulation excludes any data transfer outside the IT system's perimeter. To educate employees about the cyberthreats and behaviors that put government bodies at risk, it is highly recommended that organizations conduct cybersecurity awareness training among staff.

Russian government institutions report a significant number of DDoS attacks aimed at their online services, as well as data leakage from internal electronic resources. We recommend Russian government organizations review their current IT security strategy and consider empowering solutions already implemented with modern threat intelligence, as well as increasing security awareness training for staff. In the short term, aim to implement specific solutions e.g. anti-targeted attack, DDoS protection, cloud and mobile security and data protection.

Want to see more statistics?
Fill out this form to download the «On the Money: Growing IT Security Budgets to Protect Digital Transformation Initiatives» report
Download report
Need help with IT security?
Fill out this form and Kaspersky Lab experts will get in touch
Contact me
*These statistics are based on results from an online survey of 6,687 business representatives from companies with up to 4,999 employees around the world, conducted in 2018 by Kaspersky Lab and B2B International. Statistics based on less than 30 respondents should be used with caution, due to this being a low base.

We use cookies to make your experience of our websites better. By using and further navigating this website you accept this. Detailed information about the use of cookies on this website is available by clicking on more information

Accept and Close